statcounter

Saturday, August 4, 2012

No bleeding = not controlled

How can any U.N.or Gov't agency claim Ebola in Uganda is under control? From the beginning
it was thought to be a mysterious disease and may have been floating around for almost a month before officially named to be Ebola Sudan. Is that what it really is? Possibly, but it has mutated somewhat. They just dont wan't to say that very loud.
However it will be said here and now, this strain is diffferent and could not possibly be contained with these type of symptoms..not to mention an escaped prisoner already documented to be showing symptoms.
Notice you aren't hearing about him anymore , and his test results will be quicky announced as negative. This will be a lie at best, as he was already confined with the other prisoners brought in and kept in a ward with many other infected people. Where are all the test results?


EA in panic as Ebola strikes again in Uganda    
Saturday, August 4 2012 at 19:44
Uganda is studying the puzzling behaviour of the Ebola Sudan virus in the latest outbreak that had killed 16 people mid last week
“So far what we see is that it is atypical. Its behaviour is very suspicious,” Dr Anthony Mbonye the Commissioner for Health Services at the Ministry of Health told The EastAfrican, explaining that unlike the typical Sudan strain, victims in the latest suffer fevers without the bleeding normally associated with the virus.
“Thank God we took a sample early because we would be thinking they are suffering from fever yet it is Ebola,” said Mbonye.
The Uganda Ministry of Health declared an outbreak of Ebola in Kibaale district, about 160km west of Kampala.